This short text was born from reading an article in French by Pascal Ranaora, a professional who operates at the intersection of human rights, biodiversity, and technology, viewing Bitcoin through a philosophical lens that aligns with "autopoiesis”, the concept of a system that reproduces itself.
Some of key points found in Tanaora article:
Autopoietic System: Ranaora cites Maturana and Varela to define Bitcoin as an autopoietic system, meaning it is a closed system that "continuously generates and specifies its own organization through its operation as a system of production of its own components".
Self-Regenerating Network: Unlike traditional (allopoietic) systems that produce something different from themselves, this view suggests Bitcoin acts as a living, self-maintaining entity. It uses Proof of Work as a mechanism to continuously exist, akin to a biological entity that consumes energy to maintain its structure.
The Digital Leviathan: By framing it as a "Digital Leviathan," the perspective emphasizes Bitcoin as a decentralized, self-governing entity that operates independently of human interference or state control, similar to Thomas Hobbes' concept of a massive artificial man.
Life & Biodiversity Maximalist: Ranaora's perspective likely connects the energy consumption of Bitcoin (Proof of Work) not as a waste, but as a mechanism similar to natural processes (like fungi/mycelium) that decompose and reorganize resources.
"Science is winning": This viewpoint suggests that the mathematical and biological, self-assembling nature of Bitcoin is superior to, or more resilient than, human-controlled financial systems.
This perspective portrays Bitcoin as an emergent, evolving, and resilient "hyperorganism" that mimics biological life
Here is the link at the original Ranaora article in French: Le Léviathan Numérique : Bitcoin comme Organisme Autopoïétique